Project Snapshot

IndustryGlobal Education & Humanitarian Preparedness
GeographyDisaster-Prone LMIC Contexts
AudienceLower Secondary School Learners (Adolescents)
Delivery FormatArticulate Storyline (SCORM-Compatible)
Modules Delivered1 Fully Interactive 60-Minute Module
Interactivity LevelLevel 3.5+ (Advanced Branching Simulation)
Engagement ModelRFP Proof of Concept → Full Module Development
Output DeliveredStoryboard + Storyline Build + SCORM Package

Impact at a Glance

60-minute fully interactive disaster preparedness module

Branching video-based simulation tailored for adolescent learners

Interactive hotspots, click-and-learns, and scenario-based Knowledge Checks

End-to-end delivery (SB → SL → SCORM)

Key Challenges & Constraints

1. Age-Appropriate Cognitive Framing

Content needed to remain realistic while avoiding fear-based messaging.


2. Behaviour Over
Heroism

The training emphasised thoughtful decision-making rather than bravery.


3. Real-World
Sensitivity

The Myanmar Flood case study required contextual accuracy without distressing learners.


4. High Interactivity Requirement

The RFP required immersive simulation rather than linear instruction.


Our Strategic Approach

Instructional Governance

Audience-Centred Design

  • Adapted language and pacing for adolescent comprehension
  • Structured learning around observable behaviours rather than abstract theory

Case Study Integration

  • Incorporated real-world insights from Myanmar Floods (Ayeyarwady Region)
  • Framed environmental changes in relatable, youth-friendly contexts

Branching Simulation Architecture

  • Designed decision-based video simulation
  • Structured pause–observe–choose moments
  • Embedded branching logic influencing video progression

Development & Packaging

  • Created detailed storyboard for RFP approval
  • Built full simulation in Storyline
  • Delivered SCORM-ready LMS package

Branching Video-Based Simulation

Learners entered a realistic urban flood scenario.

At key moments: 

Each choice triggered: 

This simulated decision-making under pressure in a controlled environment. 

Behavioural Safety Framing 

The module reinforced: 

  • Stay calm 
  • Observe what has changed 
  • Avoid rushing 
  • Seek help when needed 

The message was clear: 

Safety is smart decision-making, not risk-taking. 

Estimated Learning Metrics

(Based on Comparable Youth-Focused Disaster Simulation Deployments)

High-Risk Action
Reduction:

35–50% decrease in unsafe response selection after simulation exposure

Safer Decision
Accuracy Improvement:

30–45% increase in correct behavioural responses

Retention
Strength:

Simulation-based preparedness modules demonstrate 25–40% stronger recall than static awareness materials

Completion
Benchmarks:

85–95% completion in structured school-based deployments

Impact Beyond Training

Adolescents practiced safe choices in simulated disaster conditions.

Consequence-based video feedback reinforced cautious behaviour.

Real-world case study improved relatability.

Simulation architecture can expand to other disaster scenarios.

Key Takeaways

Preparedness Must Be Practised, Not Memorised  
Branching simulation enabled adolescents to rehearse safe choices rather than passively consume awareness messages.

Behavioural Framing Reduces Risk-Taking
Pause–observe–decide logic reinforced thoughtful action over impulsive heroism.

Real-World Context Strengthens Relatability
Grounding the module in the Ayeyarwady flood case increased environmental awareness and relevance.

Age-Appropriate Design Enhances Retention
Language, pacing, and interaction were structured for adolescent cognitive levels without diluting realism.

Simulation Encourages Safer Decision Patterns
Consequence-driven video feedback reinforced hazard recognition and behavioural correction.

Humanitarian Education Requires Emotional Balance
The module maintained seriousness without fear-based messaging, preserving psychological safety.

Q1. Was this module designed specifically for adolescents?

Yes. The content and pacing were adapted for lower secondary school learners.

Q2. Was the simulation branching-based?

Yes. Learner decisions directly influenced video progression and outcome paths.

Q3. Was the case study real-world based?

Yes. The Myanmar Floods (Ayeyarwady Region) provided contextual grounding.

Q4. Was the module highly interactive?

Yes. It included branching video, hotspots, click-and-learns, and Knowledge Checks.

Q5. Was it LMS compatible?

Yes. The final module was delivered as a SCORM package.